Checking answers
Checking is part of solving, not an optional activity after it. A strong check asks whether an answer satisfies the original mathematics and the conditions of the question. Simply repeating the same calculation is weak because it tends to repeat the same error.
For example, if you obtain from an equation, substitute into the original equation. If you obtain a probability of , reject it immediately because
The best check is usually quick, independent of the main method, and capable of proving an answer wrong.
Prerequisites
Section titled “Prerequisites”You should be comfortable with exact arithmetic and rounding, calculator use, algebraic fluency and mathematical notation.
A hierarchy of checks
Section titled “A hierarchy of checks”Use these questions in order.
- Did I answer what was asked? Check the requested quantity, form, interval, accuracy and units.
- Is the answer possible? Check signs, size, domain, units and contextual restrictions.
- Does it satisfy the original problem? Substitute, differentiate, integrate or reconstruct as appropriate.
- Can I verify it independently? Use a graph, estimate, alternative formula or reverse operation.
A check need not reproduce the entire solution. It should target the steps most likely to fail.
Check the demand before the mathematics
Section titled “Check the demand before the mathematics”Many correct calculations lose marks because the final answer does not match the question.
Before moving on, underline mentally or on paper:
- the quantity required;
- whether an exact or decimal answer is wanted;
- the required significant figures or decimal places;
- any interval, such as ;
- any condition, such as or ;
- required units and whether a conclusion in context is needed.
Worked example: the correct roots on a restricted interval
Section titled “Worked example: the correct roots on a restricted interval”Solve
The reference angle is . Sine is positive in the first and second quadrants, so
Both values substitute correctly. The value also has sine , but it is not in the stated interval. Substitution alone is therefore not a complete check. The domain condition must also be checked.
See trigonometric equations for systematic solution methods.
Estimate before using a calculator
Section titled “Estimate before using a calculator”An estimate gives a target region and catches keying errors, misplaced brackets and unreasonable precision.
Worked example: detecting a calculator entry error
Section titled “Worked example: detecting a calculator entry error”Evaluate
Before calculating,
The calculator value is approximately
This is consistent with the estimate. An answer of or would signal an incorrect power of ten.
An estimate need not be very accurate. Its purpose is to distinguish a plausible scale from an impossible one.
Check equations by substitution
Section titled “Check equations by substitution”Substitute into the original equation, not a rearranged line near the end. Earlier rearrangement may have introduced or lost solutions.
Worked example: two quadratic roots
Section titled “Worked example: two quadratic roots”Suppose solving
gives and .
For ,
For ,
Both roots satisfy the original equation. A second check uses the sum and product of roots. For ,
Here,
This checks the pair independently. Review quadratic equations if these relationships are unfamiliar.
Extraneous solutions
Section titled “Extraneous solutions”Some operations are not reversible without conditions. Squaring both sides can introduce solutions.
Worked example: reject a false solution
Section titled “Worked example: reject a false solution”Solve
The square root is non-negative, so first , giving . Squaring gives
so
and therefore
Check in the original equation:
but
Thus the only solution is
The value solves the squared equation, not the original equation.
Check identities at structural and numerical levels
Section titled “Check identities at structural and numerical levels”An identity must hold for every value in its domain. Testing one value cannot prove an identity, but it can disprove an incorrect one quickly.
Suppose you claim
Recombine the right-hand side:
This algebraic reconstruction proves the identity for . A numerical spot check, say , gives on both sides, but this alone would not be proof. See partial fractions for more decomposition checks.
Use inverse operations in calculus
Section titled “Use inverse operations in calculus”Differentiation and integration check one another.
Worked example: check an indefinite integral
Section titled “Worked example: check an indefinite integral”Suppose
Differentiate the proposed antiderivative:
The derivative reproduces the integrand, so the antiderivative is correct. The constant disappears on differentiation, which is why the check cannot determine its value.
Worked example: check a stationary point
Section titled “Worked example: check a stationary point”For
suppose the stationary coordinates are and . Since
substitution gives
Now classify them. Since
we have , so is a local maximum, while , so is a local minimum. Checking only that verifies stationarity, not the classification. Continue with stationary points and curve sketching.
Definite integrals and area
Section titled “Definite integrals and area”For a definite integral, check:
- sign: is negative where negative signed area dominates;
- scale: compare with a surrounding rectangle;
- limits: reversing them changes the sign;
- area wording: geometric area cannot be negative.
For example, if on , then
An answer of is impossible even before the integral is recalculated. See definite integrals and areas.
Check graphs against algebra
Section titled “Check graphs against algebra”A sketch should agree with every algebraic feature you know:
- intercepts;
- stationary points;
- asymptotes;
- symmetry;
- domain and range;
- end behaviour.
Worked example: a rational function
Section titled “Worked example: a rational function”Consider
Rewrite it as
This reveals the vertical asymptote and horizontal asymptote . The intercepts are
A calculator graph that appears to cross or settle towards has been entered or viewed incorrectly. A graph is evidence, not a substitute for exact algebra. Window settings and pixel resolution can conceal roots or asymptotic behaviour.
Check numerical methods by their defining property
Section titled “Check numerical methods by their defining property”An approximate root of should make small. However, a small residual alone can be misleading when the graph is very flat or very steep, so also check the required interval or accuracy statement.
Worked example: verify a root to three decimal places
Section titled “Worked example: verify a root to three decimal places”Suppose is proposed as a root of
To justify a root of to three decimal places, test the rounding boundaries:
Because is continuous and changes sign between these values, a root lies in
so it rounds to . Reporting only suggests closeness but does not by itself establish correct rounding. Learn the full argument in change of sign methods.
Check probabilities and statistics
Section titled “Check probabilities and statistics”Statistical answers have strong built-in constraints.
Probability checks
Section titled “Probability checks”Every probability must satisfy
Probabilities for mutually exclusive and exhaustive outcomes sum to . Also,
and for independent events,
Do not use the last equality unless independence is stated or established.
Worked example: check a binomial distribution
Section titled “Worked example: check a binomial distribution”Let . A calculation gives
The value lies in , but that is only a basic check. Since
a probability somewhat below for is plausible. An independent complement check is
Both calculator routes should agree apart from rounding. If they do not, check whether the calculator endpoints are inclusive. Review the binomial distribution.
Summary statistic checks
Section titled “Summary statistic checks”For a data set:
- the mean must lie between the smallest and largest values;
- variance and standard deviation cannot be negative;
- adding a constant to every value adds to the mean but leaves variance unchanged;
- multiplying every value by multiplies standard deviation by and variance by .
These checks often expose confusion between variance and standard deviation. See averages and spread.
Check mechanics with units and physical sense
Section titled “Check mechanics with units and physical sense”Dimensions expose equations that cannot be physically valid. Quantities may be added or equated only when their dimensions agree.
For instance,
is dimensionally consistent because
By contrast, is not dimensionally consistent.
Worked example: check a constant acceleration result
Section titled “Worked example: check a constant acceleration result”A particle starts with velocity and accelerates at for seconds. Suppose you obtain and .
First,
Independently, average velocity under constant acceleration is
Hence
The second method verifies the displacement without repeating the original displacement formula. See constant acceleration.
Also ask whether the sign is meaningful. A negative velocity indicates direction, not an impossible speed. A negative mass, negative elapsed time in an ordinary model, or coefficient of friction below zero is usually impossible.
Exact values, rounding and calculator displays
Section titled “Exact values, rounding and calculator displays”Keep exact values during working unless the question requires decimals. For example,
exactly. Replacing by too early gives only an approximation and can distort later rounding.
If a final answer is required to three significant figures:
- retain extra calculator digits during working;
- round once, at the end;
- state trailing zeros when they communicate accuracy, such as ;
- include units after rounding.
Check calculator mode as well. Trigonometric work in radians requires radian mode. For example,
whereas a calculator interpreting as degrees will not return .
Common weak checks
Section titled “Common weak checks”Repeating the same working
Section titled “Repeating the same working”Reading the same lines again may miss the same sign error. Prefer substitution or a reverse operation.
Trusting the answer because it looks neat
Section titled “Trusting the answer because it looks neat”Correct answers can be awkward, and incorrect answers can be integers. Mathematical conditions, not appearance, decide.
Treating a graph as proof
Section titled “Treating a graph as proof”A graph can support an answer and reveal missing solutions, but it usually provides approximate evidence only.
Checking only one of several answers
Section titled “Checking only one of several answers”Every root, coordinate, probability or case must be checked. One valid solution does not validate the others.
Ignoring assumptions
Section titled “Ignoring assumptions”Squaring, cancelling, taking logarithms, dividing by an expression and using inverse trigonometric functions all impose conditions. Check excluded values and domains explicitly.
A fast exam routine
Section titled “A fast exam routine”For a short question, use a ten-second check:
- Read the final sentence again.
- Check sign, scale, domain and units.
- Substitute or reverse one decisive step.
- Check rounding and presentation.
For a long question, use earlier parts. If part (b) gives a value for use in part (c), your result in part (b) should be compatible with it. If later working produces an impossible value, trace back to the earliest point at which a restriction was violated.
Self-check
Section titled “Self-check”Try these without looking back.
- A solution of is reported as . Give two reasons it is wrong.
- A student finds . Check the answer.
- A probability calculation gives and . What is wrong?
- A particle has , and constant acceleration for seconds. Check the proposed displacement independently.
- Explain why testing cannot prove that two expressions are identical.
Answers
Section titled “Answers”-
The domain requires , so . Also, substitution gives , which is not defined over the reals. In fact, gives , so .
-
An antiderivative is . Therefore
so the answer is correct. It is also plausible because the integrand is positive on .
-
Complements must sum to , but . At least one value is wrong or has been rounded far too severely.
-
The average velocity is . Hence , so the proposed displacement is correct.
-
Agreement at one input proves only that the expressions have the same value there. Different functions can intersect. An identity requires algebraic proof for every value in the common domain.
Next steps
Section titled “Next steps”Build checks into your method selection with problem solving. Then practise checking in topic-specific settings through quadratics, definite integrals, probability and mechanics modelling.