Skip to content

Modelling assumptions in mechanics

A mechanical model replaces a complicated real situation with a simpler mathematical one. Its assumptions decide which quantities and forces appear in the equations. A good model keeps the features that matter for the question and neglects those whose effects are small.

For example, modelling a falling ball as a particle moving under uniform gravity gives

a=g.a=-g.

This is useful near the Earth’s surface when air resistance is negligible. It is not a claim that the ball has no size or that air does not exist.

You should be able to:

  • distinguish a scalar from a vector;
  • rearrange formulae and substitute with units;
  • understand displacement, velocity, acceleration, mass and force;
  • state that weight has magnitude mgmg and acts vertically downwards.

Review the mechanics overview and quantities and units if these ideas are unfamiliar.

A complete mechanics solution moves through four stages:

  1. Choose a model. Decide what to include and what to neglect.
  2. Translate. Draw a diagram and form equations from the assumptions.
  3. Solve. Use algebra, trigonometry, vectors or calculus.
  4. Interpret and assess. Give units and direction, then consider whether the prediction is reasonable.

The same real situation may need different models for different questions. A train may be treated as a particle when finding its journey time, but not when calculating a turning moment about one end.

A particle has mass but negligible dimensions. Its entire mass is treated as concentrated at one point.

Consequences:

  • its position can be represented by one point;
  • its shape and rotation are ignored;
  • all forces may be drawn as acting at that point when studying translation.

A car can be modelled as a particle when its length is tiny compared with the length of its journey. It cannot be treated as a particle if its size, balance or rotation matters.

A rigid body does not deform. The distance between any two points in it remains constant. A rod is a thin rigid body whose length matters but whose width and thickness are negligible.

These assumptions let us use fixed distances when taking moments. A real diving board bends, so treating it as a rigid rod may be unsuitable if its deflection is being studied.

A uniform body has mass distributed evenly. For a uniform straight rod of length LL, the centre of mass is at its midpoint, L/2L/2 from either end. Its weight acts there in the model.

Uniform does not mean motionless, horizontal or of constant speed. It describes mass distribution.

A light string or rod has negligible mass compared with the attached objects. For a light string, the model does not need an extra weight term for the string.

With a light string passing over a smooth pulley, the tension is usually modelled as having the same magnitude throughout:

T1=T2=T.T_1=T_2=T.

If the string had appreciable mass, different parts of it could require different tensions to accelerate them.

An inextensible string does not stretch. If two particles are joined by a taut inextensible string passing over a fixed pulley, their displacements have equal magnitudes. Therefore their speeds and acceleration magnitudes are equal while the string remains taut:

s1=s2,qquadv1=v2,qquada1=a2.|s_1|=|s_2|,qquad |v_1|=|v_2|,qquad |a_1|=|a_2|.

Their directions need not be the same. One particle may move upwards while the other moves downwards.

A smooth contact has negligible friction.

  • On a smooth surface, the contact force is normal to the surface.
  • A smooth pulley offers no frictional resistance to the string sliding over it.

Smooth does not mean horizontal. A smooth inclined plane still exerts a normal reaction and the particle’s weight still has a component down the plane.

A rough surface can exert friction parallel to the contact surface. Friction opposes actual or impending relative motion. Its magnitude must come from the information or friction model given in the question. It is not automatically muRmu R.

A small pulley or peg has negligible dimensions, so lengths may be measured to its centre and the string’s contact arc may be ignored. If it is also smooth, tension has the same magnitude on both sides in the standard model.

Near the Earth’s surface, gravity is modelled as uniform. Every freely falling particle has constant downward acceleration of magnitude

g9.8 ms2,g\approx 9.8\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}},

unless the question supplies another value. The weight of mass mm is then the constant force

W=mg.W=mg.

This model becomes less accurate over very large changes in altitude.

If air resistance is ignored, the only force on a freely moving projectile is its weight. Hence its acceleration is vertically downwards and constant:

a=(0g)\mathbf a=\begin{pmatrix}0\\-g\end{pmatrix}

when the positive yy direction is upwards. Horizontal velocity is then constant. Real drag depends on factors such as speed, shape and air density, so ignoring it is less credible for a feather or a fast shuttlecock than for a dense ball moving modestly fast.

Do not merely list assumptions. Ask what each one permits you to write.

AssumptionMathematical consequence
ParticleIgnore dimensions and rotational effects
Rigid rodDistances used in moments remain fixed
Uniform rodWeight acts at the midpoint
Light stringIgnore string mass and weight
Inextensible taut stringConnected particles have equal acceleration magnitudes
Smooth surfaceNo friction force at the contact
Smooth pulley with light stringSame tension on both sides
Uniform gravitygg is constant and weight is mgmg
Negligible air resistanceA free projectile has acceleration (0,g)(0,-g)

Worked example 1: translate words into a force model

Section titled “Worked example 1: translate words into a force model”

A 4 kg4\ \mathrm{kg} particle rests on a smooth plane inclined at 3030^\circ to the horizontal. State the forces and find the component of the resultant force down the plane.

The word particle tells us to ignore size and rotation. Smooth tells us that there is no friction.

The forces are:

  • weight 4g4g vertically downwards;
  • normal reaction RR perpendicular to the plane.

Resolve parallel to the plane. The reaction has no parallel component, so

F=4gsin30=4(9.8)(12)=19.6 NF_{\parallel}=4g\sin30^\circ =4(9.8)\left(\frac12\right) =\boxed{19.6\ \mathrm N}

down the plane.

If the plane were rough, an additional friction force could act along the plane, so 4gsin304g\sin30^\circ would no longer necessarily be the resultant.

A 6 kg6\ \mathrm{kg} particle is on a smooth plane inclined at 2020^\circ. What feature of the force diagram follows from the word smooth, and what is the component of weight down the plane?

Answer

There is no friction force. The component of weight down the plane is

6gsin2020.1 N.6g\sin20^\circ\approx\boxed{20.1\ \mathrm N}.

Particles AA and BB, of masses 3 kg3\ \mathrm{kg} and 5 kg5\ \mathrm{kg}, are connected by a light inextensible string over a small smooth pulley. They are released from rest, with BB moving downwards. Explain the consequences of every modelling assumption and find their acceleration and the tension. Use g=9.8 ms2g=9.8\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}.

The assumptions mean:

  • particles: ignore size and rotation of AA and BB;
  • light string: ignore the string’s mass;
  • inextensible string: both particles have acceleration magnitude aa;
  • smooth pulley: the tension has one common magnitude TT;
  • small pulley: ignore the length of string wrapped around it.

For AA, taking upwards as positive,

T3g=3a.(1)T-3g=3a. \tag{1}

For BB, taking downwards as positive,

5gT=5a.(2)5g-T=5a. \tag{2}

Adding (1) and (2) eliminates the internal tension:

2g=8a,2g=8a,

so

a=g4=2.45 ms2.a=\frac g4=\boxed{2.45\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}}.

Substitute into (1):

T=3g+3a=29.4+7.35=36.75 N.T=3g+3a=29.4+7.35=\boxed{36.75\ \mathrm N}.

The particles have equal acceleration magnitudes, but their acceleration vectors point in different directions.

In the example, suppose the string stretches slightly. Which equality becomes unreliable first?

Answer

The particles need not have equal acceleration magnitudes, so using the same aa in both equations becomes unreliable. The tensions might also differ if the string’s mass or elastic dynamics cannot be neglected.

Worked example 3: a uniform rod and a non-uniform rod

Section titled “Worked example 3: a uniform rod and a non-uniform rod”

A uniform horizontal rod ABAB has length 4 m4\ \mathrm m and weight 60 N60\ \mathrm N. It is supported at AA and BB. A 100 N100\ \mathrm N load acts 1 m1\ \mathrm m from AA. Find the reaction at BB.

Because the rod is uniform, its weight acts at its midpoint, 2 m2\ \mathrm m from AA. Taking moments about AA,

4RB=60(2)+100(1).4R_B=60(2)+100(1).

Therefore

RB=2204=55 N.R_B=\frac{220}{4}=\boxed{55\ \mathrm N}.

If the rod were merely described as rigid, its centre of mass would not be known. Writing the 60 N60\ \mathrm N weight at the midpoint would then be unjustified. If its centre of mass were instead 2.5 m2.5\ \mathrm m from AA,

4RB=60(2.5)+100(1),4R_B=60(2.5)+100(1),

giving RB=62.5 NR_B=62.5\ \mathrm N. The modelling detail changes the numerical prediction.

Worked example 4: predicting the effect of air resistance

Section titled “Worked example 4: predicting the effect of air resistance”

A ball is projected vertically upwards at 20 ms120\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}. A model neglecting air resistance predicts its maximum height above the launch point. Use g=9.8 ms2g=9.8\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}, then explain how drag would affect the prediction.

Choose upwards as positive. Then

u=20,qquadv=0,qquada=9.8.u=20,qquad v=0,qquad a=-9.8.

Using v2=u2+2asv^2=u^2+2as,

0=2022(9.8)s,0=20^2-2(9.8)s,

so

s=40019.620.4 m.s=\frac{400}{19.6}\approx\boxed{20.4\ \mathrm m}.

During ascent, air resistance acts downwards as well as weight. The real downward resultant and deceleration are therefore larger than in the model, so the real maximum height will be less than 20.4 m20.4\ \mathrm m, assuming the quoted launch speed is unchanged.

This conclusion comes from comparing forces. A vague statement that the answer is merely “less accurate” misses the direction of the error.

The no-drag model predicts a projectile’s horizontal range. In reality, drag is appreciable. Is the model likely to overestimate or underestimate the range?

Answer

It is likely to overestimate the range. Drag opposes the projectile’s motion and reduces its horizontal speed, whereas the no-drag model keeps horizontal velocity constant.

An assumption is reasonable when the neglected effect is small enough for the model’s purpose. This depends on scale, required precision and the quantity being predicted.

Use this structure:

  1. Name the assumption.
  2. Identify the neglected physical effect.
  3. State how that effect would change the forces, motion or answer, if the direction is clear.

Treating a lorry as a particle over a 200 km200\ \mathrm{km} journey: reasonable for journey time because the lorry’s length is negligible compared with the distance. Unsuitable for deciding whether it fits entirely on a short bridge.

Treating a cable as light: reasonable if its mass is tiny compared with the suspended loads. If its mass is appreciable, its weight must be included and tension may vary along it.

Ignoring air resistance for a falling paper cone: probably poor because drag is large compared with its weight. The constant acceleration model may substantially overestimate its speed.

Assuming a road is smooth: it removes friction. This may be useful for isolating another effect, but it is unsuitable for modelling braking, where tyre road friction is essential.

No real string is perfectly light or inextensible. A model is judged by usefulness and accuracy for a stated purpose, not literal truth.

Every assumption makes a prediction too large

Section titled “Every assumption makes a prediction too large”

The direction depends on the physics. Ignoring drag usually overestimates projectile range, but assuming a perfectly smooth slope may either increase or decrease a calculated quantity depending on what is being asked.

Smooth means no friction. A normal reaction can still act perpendicular to the surface.

These are separate assumptions. Light concerns mass. Inextensible concerns length. A question may need both.

Uniform mass distribution concerns where mass is located. Uniform motion concerns velocity. The meanings are unrelated.

A negative answer proves the model is wrong

Section titled “A negative answer proves the model is wrong”

A negative vector component often means the true direction is opposite to the chosen positive direction. It becomes physically problematic only when the quantity cannot be negative, such as a calculated mass or elapsed time.

For each statement, identify the relevant modelling assumption.

  1. The weight of a beam acts at its midpoint.
  2. Two connected blocks have equal acceleration magnitudes.
  3. No force acts parallel to a contact plane.
  4. The tension is the same on both sides of a pulley.
  5. A body’s rotation can be ignored.
Answers
  1. The beam is uniform and straight.
  2. The connecting string is taut and inextensible.
  3. The plane is smooth.
  4. In the usual model, the string is light and the pulley is smooth.
  5. The body is modelled as a particle, provided its size and rotational behaviour are irrelevant.

Before accepting a mechanics solution, ask:

  • What object or system am I modelling?
  • Which words in the question encode assumptions?
  • What force, mass, dimension or deformation does each assumption remove?
  • Which equalities follow, such as common tension or common acceleration magnitude?
  • Do the answer’s units, direction and size make physical sense?
  • Which omitted effect is most likely to limit the prediction?

Apply these assumptions when learning kinematics language and constant acceleration. Then use them explicitly in forces and free body diagrams, moments, projectiles and connected particles.