Skip to content

The normal distribution

By MathLab · Reviewed

The normal distribution is a continuous probability model with a symmetric, bell-shaped density curve. It is used for variables whose values cluster around a central value, with increasingly extreme values becoming increasingly rare.

If a continuous random variable XX has mean μ\mu and variance σ2\sigma^2, write

X∼N⁡(μ,σ2).\boxed{X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2)}.

The second parameter is the variance, not the standard deviation. Thus

X∼N⁡(50,16)X\sim\operatorname{N}(50,16)

means that μ=50\mu=50 and σ=4\sigma=4.

This lesson explains the model, probability calculations, inverse problems, parameter estimation and the normal approximation to a binomial distribution.

You should be able to:

Every normal density curve has these properties:

  • it is symmetric about x=μx=\mu;
  • its mean, median and mode are all μ\mu;
  • the total area under the curve is 11;
  • the curve approaches, but never meets, the horizontal axis;
  • its points of inflection are at μ−σ\mu-\sigma and μ+σ\mu+\sigma.

The mean μ\mu controls the location of the curve. Increasing μ\mu translates the curve to the right without changing its shape.

The standard deviation σ\sigma controls the spread. A larger σ\sigma produces a wider, lower curve because the total area must remain 11.

The density function is

f(x)=1σ2πexp⁡(−(x−μ)22σ2),f(x)=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}} \exp\left(-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right),

but A-level probability calculations use calculator distribution functions rather than direct integration of this expression.

For every normal distribution, approximately

P⁡(μ−σ<X<μ+σ)≈0.6827,P⁡(μ−2σ<X<μ+2σ)≈0.9545,P⁡(μ−3σ<X<μ+3σ)≈0.9973.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(\mu-\sigma<X<\mu+\sigma)&\approx0.6827,\\ \operatorname{P}(\mu-2\sigma<X<\mu+2\sigma)&\approx0.9545,\\ \operatorname{P}(\mu-3\sigma<X<\mu+3\sigma)&\approx0.9973. \end{aligned}

These values are useful for judging whether a calculator answer is plausible. They should not replace a calculator when an accurate probability is required.

The masses MM grams of packets are modelled by

M∼N⁡(250,6.25).M\sim\operatorname{N}(250,6.25).

State the mean and standard deviation, and estimate the central interval containing about 95%95\% of packet masses.

The mean is

μ=250.\mu=250.

Since σ2=6.25\sigma^2=6.25,

σ=6.25=2.5.\sigma=\sqrt{6.25}=2.5.

About 95%95\% of values lie within two standard deviations of the mean:

250−2(2.5)<M<250+2(2.5).250-2(2.5)<M<250+2(2.5).

Therefore the estimated interval is

245<M<255.\boxed{245<M<255}.

Suppose T∼N⁡(18,9)T\sim\operatorname{N}(18,9). State the axis of symmetry and the coordinates of the two points of inflection.

Answer

Here μ=18\mu=18 and σ=9=3\sigma=\sqrt9=3. The axis of symmetry is

x=18,\boxed{x=18},

and the points of inflection occur when x=18±3x=18\pm3, so their xx coordinates are

15 and 21.\boxed{15\text{ and }21}.

Since a single point has zero width,

P⁡(X=a)=0\boxed{\operatorname{P}(X=a)=0}

for every continuous random variable. Consequently,

P⁡(X<a)=P⁡(X≤a)\operatorname{P}(X<a)=\operatorname{P}(X\leq a)

and similarly

P⁡(X>a)=P⁡(X≥a).\operatorname{P}(X>a)=\operatorname{P}(X\geq a).

This differs fundamentally from a discrete distribution, where P⁡(X=a)\operatorname{P}(X=a) may be positive.

Normal distribution calculators usually offer:

  • normal CDF or normal cumulative probability for an area between bounds;
  • inverse normal for a boundary corresponding to a given cumulative area.

Always identify the required region before entering values. For an upper tail, either use an upper bound of +∞+\infty or calculate a complement.

Worked example 2: a lower-tail probability

Section titled “Worked example 2: a lower-tail probability”

The lifetime LL hours of a component is modelled by

L∼N⁡(1200,1502).L\sim\operatorname{N}(1200,150^2).

Find the probability that a component lasts fewer than 10001000 hours.

The required area is to the left of 10001000:

P⁡(L<1000).\operatorname{P}(L<1000).

Using normal CDF with lower bound −∞-\infty, upper bound 10001000, mean 12001200 and standard deviation 150150 gives

P⁡(L<1000)=0.091211…\operatorname{P}(L<1000)=0.091211\ldots

so

P⁡(L<1000)≈0.0912.\boxed{\operatorname{P}(L<1000)\approx0.0912}.

The answer is below 0.50.5, as expected because 10001000 is below the mean.

Worked example 3: probability between two values

Section titled “Worked example 3: probability between two values”

The heights HH cm of plants are modelled by

H∼N⁡(42,52).H\sim\operatorname{N}(42,5^2).

Find P⁡(38<H<50)\operatorname{P}(38<H<50).

Use lower bound 3838, upper bound 5050, mean 4242 and standard deviation 55:

P⁡(38<H<50)=0.733313…≈0.733.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(38<H<50) &=0.733313\ldots\\ &\approx\boxed{0.733}. \end{aligned}

The interval extends 0.80.8 standard deviations below the mean and 1.61.6 standard deviations above it, so an answer greater than 0.50.5 is reasonable.

Worked example 4: an upper-tail probability

Section titled “Worked example 4: an upper-tail probability”

Scores SS on a test are modelled by

S∼N⁡(64,122).S\sim\operatorname{N}(64,12^2).

Find the probability that a randomly selected score exceeds 8080.

The complement is often easiest:

P⁡(S>80)=1−P⁡(S≤80)=1−0.908788…=0.091211…\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(S>80) &=1-\operatorname{P}(S\leq80)\\ &=1-0.908788\ldots\\ &=0.091211\ldots \end{aligned}

Therefore

P⁡(S>80)≈0.0912.\boxed{\operatorname{P}(S>80)\approx0.0912}.

The curve is symmetric about μ\mu, so

P⁡(X<μ−a)=P⁡(X>μ+a).\operatorname{P}(X<\mu-a)=\operatorname{P}(X>\mu+a).

Also,

P⁡(X<μ)=P⁡(X>μ)=12.\operatorname{P}(X<\mu)=\operatorname{P}(X>\mu)=\frac12.

For example, if X∼N⁡(30,42)X\sim\operatorname{N}(30,4^2), then

P⁡(X<23)=P⁡(X>37).\operatorname{P}(X<23)=\operatorname{P}(X>37).

Let X∼N⁡(70,82)X\sim\operatorname{N}(70,8^2). Find:

  1. P⁡(X<62)\operatorname{P}(X<62);
  2. P⁡(62<X<78)\operatorname{P}(62<X<78);
  3. P⁡(X>70)\operatorname{P}(X>70).
Answer

The values 6262 and 7878 are one standard deviation below and above the mean.

P⁡(X<62)=0.1587,P⁡(62<X<78)=0.6827,P⁡(X>70)=0.5.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(X<62)&=\boxed{0.1587},\\ \operatorname{P}(62<X<78)&=\boxed{0.6827},\\ \operatorname{P}(X>70)&=\boxed{0.5}. \end{aligned}

Any normal random variable can be transformed to the standard normal distribution

Z∼N⁡(0,1)Z\sim\operatorname{N}(0,1)

using

Z=X−μσ.\boxed{Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}}.

For an observed value xx, its z-score is

z=x−μσ.z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}.

It measures signed distance from the mean in standard deviations:

  • z=0z=0 means the value equals the mean;
  • z=1.5z=1.5 means it is 1.51.5 standard deviations above the mean;
  • z=−2z=-2 means it is 22 standard deviations below the mean.

Standardising subtracts the location μ\mu, then divides by the scale σ\sigma. The direction of an inequality is unchanged because σ>0\sigma>0.

Worked example 5: standardising a boundary

Section titled “Worked example 5: standardising a boundary”

Let X∼N⁡(40,62)X\sim\operatorname{N}(40,6^2). Find P⁡(X<49)\operatorname{P}(X<49) by standardising.

Convert the boundary to a z-score:

z=49−406=1.5.z=\frac{49-40}{6}=1.5.

Therefore

P⁡(X<49)=P⁡(Z<49−406)=P⁡(Z<1.5)=0.933192…\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(X<49) &=\operatorname{P}\left(Z<\frac{49-40}{6}\right)\\ &=\operatorname{P}(Z<1.5)\\ &=0.933192\ldots \end{aligned}

and hence

P⁡(X<49)≈0.9332.\boxed{\operatorname{P}(X<49)\approx0.9332}.

Modern calculators can obtain the same result directly from X∼N⁡(40,62)X\sim\operatorname{N}(40,6^2), but z-scores expose the reasoning and are essential in parameter problems.

Worked example 6: comparing different scales

Section titled “Worked example 6: comparing different scales”

Amira scores 7272 on a test with mean 6060 and standard deviation 88. Ben scores 8484 on a different test with mean 7070 and standard deviation 1010. Who performed better relative to their group?

Calculate both z-scores:

zA=72−608=1.5,z_A=\frac{72-60}{8}=1.5, zB=84−7010=1.4.z_B=\frac{84-70}{10}=1.4.

Since 1.5>1.41.5>1.4, Amira’s score lies further above her group’s mean. Therefore

Amira performed better relative to her group.\boxed{\text{Amira performed better relative to her group.}}

This comparison uses the normal models, not the raw scores alone.

For Y∼N⁡(25,42)Y\sim\operatorname{N}(25,4^2):

  1. find the z-score corresponding to y=19y=19;
  2. use symmetry to find P⁡(Y>31)\operatorname{P}(Y>31) from P⁡(Y<19)\operatorname{P}(Y<19).
Answer z=19−254=−1.5.z=\frac{19-25}{4}=-1.5.

The values 1919 and 3131 are equally far from the mean, so

P⁡(Y>31)=P⁡(Y<19)=0.0668\operatorname{P}(Y>31)=\operatorname{P}(Y<19)=\boxed{0.0668}

to four decimal places.

An inverse normal calculation starts with an area and finds the corresponding boundary. Most calculators expect the cumulative area to the left of the boundary.

If

P⁡(X<a)=p,\operatorname{P}(X<a)=p,

enter left-tail area pp. If

P⁡(X>a)=p,\operatorname{P}(X>a)=p,

enter left-tail area 1−p1-p.

The journey time TT minutes is modelled by

T∼N⁡(35,62).T\sim\operatorname{N}(35,6^2).

Find the time below which 90%90\% of journeys fall.

We need tt such that

P⁡(T<t)=0.90.\operatorname{P}(T<t)=0.90.

Using inverse normal with area 0.900.90, mean 3535 and standard deviation 66 gives

t=42.689…t=42.689\ldots

Therefore

t≈42.7 minutes.\boxed{t\approx42.7\text{ minutes}}.

The diameter DD mm of a manufactured part is modelled by

D∼N⁡(20,0.122).D\sim\operatorname{N}(20,0.12^2).

The largest 2%2\% are rejected. Find the minimum diameter that is rejected.

If the cutoff is dd, then

P⁡(D>d)=0.02.\operatorname{P}(D>d)=0.02.

An inverse normal function uses the area to the left:

P⁡(D<d)=1−0.02=0.98.\operatorname{P}(D<d)=1-0.02=0.98.

Using area 0.980.98, mean 2020 and standard deviation 0.120.12 gives

d=20.2464…d=20.2464\ldots

so the cutoff is

20.25 mm approximately.\boxed{20.25\text{ mm approximately}}.

Let X∼N⁡(100,152)X\sim\operatorname{N}(100,15^2). Find aa such that

P⁡(100−a<X<100+a)=0.95.\operatorname{P}(100-a<X<100+a)=0.95.

The omitted probability is

1−0.95=0.05.1-0.95=0.05.

Symmetry puts 0.0250.025 in each tail. The upper boundary therefore has cumulative area

1−0.025=0.975.1-0.025=0.975.

The 0.9750.975 standard normal quantile is 1.95996…1.95996\ldots, so

a=1.95996…×15=29.399…a=1.95996\ldots\times15=29.399\ldots

and

a≈29.4.\boxed{a\approx29.4}.

Weights WW kg are modelled by W∼N⁡(75,112)W\sim\operatorname{N}(75,11^2). Find:

  1. the 25th percentile;
  2. the cutoff exceeded by the heaviest 10%10\%.
Answer

For the 25th percentile, use left-tail area 0.250.25:

W=75+(−0.67449…)(11)=67.6 kg approximately.W=75+(-0.67449\ldots)(11)=\boxed{67.6\text{ kg approximately}}.

The heaviest 10%10\% lie above the cutoff, so its left-tail area is 0.900.90:

W=75+(1.28155…)(11)=89.1 kg approximately.W=75+(1.28155\ldots)(11)=\boxed{89.1\text{ kg approximately}}.

Probability statements can determine μ\mu or σ\sigma. Translate each statement into a standard normal quantile, then use

x−μσ=z.\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}=z.

Do not round the quantile early. Retain several decimal places until the final answer.

Suppose X∼N⁡(μ,52)X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,5^2) and

P⁡(X<27)=0.80.\operatorname{P}(X<27)=0.80.

Find μ\mu.

The standard normal value with cumulative probability 0.800.80 is

z=0.841621…z=0.841621\ldots

Therefore

27−μ5=0.841621…\frac{27-\mu}{5}=0.841621\ldots

so

27−μ=4.20810…,μ=22.7918…\begin{aligned} 27-\mu&=4.20810\ldots,\\ \mu&=22.7918\ldots \end{aligned}

Hence

μ≈22.8.\boxed{\mu\approx22.8}.

The result is sensible: 2727 has 80%80\% of the distribution below it, so it must lie above the mean.

Worked example 11: finding both parameters

Section titled “Worked example 11: finding both parameters”

Let X∼N⁡(μ,σ2)X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2), where

P⁡(X<32)=0.10\operatorname{P}(X<32)=0.10

and

P⁡(X<50)=0.90.\operatorname{P}(X<50)=0.90.

Find μ\mu and σ\sigma.

The corresponding z-values are

z0.10=−1.281552…,z0.90=1.281552…z_{0.10}=-1.281552\ldots, \qquad z_{0.90}=1.281552\ldots

so

32−μσ=−1.281552…\frac{32-\mu}{\sigma}=-1.281552\ldots

and

50−μσ=1.281552…\frac{50-\mu}{\sigma}=1.281552\ldots

The probabilities are symmetric, so 3232 and 5050 are equally far from the mean:

μ=32+502=41.\mu=\frac{32+50}{2}=41.

Then

50−41σ=1.281552…,\frac{50-41}{\sigma}=1.281552\ldots,

giving

σ=91.281552…=7.02273…\sigma=\frac9{1.281552\ldots}=7.02273\ldots

Therefore

μ=41,σ≈7.02.\boxed{\mu=41,\qquad \sigma\approx7.02}.

Worked example 12: a non-symmetric pair of conditions

Section titled “Worked example 12: a non-symmetric pair of conditions”

Suppose Y∼N⁡(μ,σ2)Y\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2) and

P⁡(Y<24)=0.20,P⁡(Y<39)=0.70.\operatorname{P}(Y<24)=0.20, \qquad \operatorname{P}(Y<39)=0.70.

Find μ\mu and σ\sigma.

From inverse normal,

z0.20=−0.841621…,z0.70=0.524401…z_{0.20}=-0.841621\ldots, \qquad z_{0.70}=0.524401\ldots

Hence

24=μ−0.841621σ24=\mu-0.841621\sigma

and

39=μ+0.524401σ.39=\mu+0.524401\sigma.

Subtracting the first equation from the second gives

15=(0.524401+0.841621)σ.15=(0.524401+0.841621)\sigma.

Thus

σ=10.9808…\sigma=10.9808\ldots

and, substituting into the second equation,

μ=39−0.524401(10.9808…)=33.2419…\mu=39-0.524401(10.9808\ldots)=33.2419\ldots

Therefore

μ≈33.2,σ≈11.0.\boxed{\mu\approx33.2,\qquad\sigma\approx11.0}.

Let X∼N⁡(μ,42)X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,4^2) and P⁡(X>30)=0.05\operatorname{P}(X>30)=0.05. Find μ\mu.

Answer

The area below 3030 is 0.950.95, whose z-value is 1.644854…1.644854\ldots. Therefore

30−μ4=1.644854…\frac{30-\mu}{4}=1.644854\ldots

and

μ=23.4 approximately.\boxed{\mu=23.4\text{ approximately}}.

A normal model may be reasonable when:

  • the variable is continuous;
  • the data are approximately symmetric and unimodal;
  • frequencies taper smoothly on both sides of the centre;
  • there are no strong outliers or physical boundaries close to the bulk of the data;
  • contextual knowledge supports a stable population with many small sources of variation.

A histogram or other data presentation can reveal skewness, multiple peaks, gaps and outliers. Context still matters. A small sample can look roughly bell-shaped by chance, and some measurements cannot sensibly take the negative values that a normal model technically permits.

If

X∼B⁡(n,p),X\sim\operatorname{B}(n,p),

then

E⁡(X)=np,Var⁡(X)=np(1−p).\operatorname{E}(X)=np, \qquad \operatorname{Var}(X)=np(1-p).

When nn is large and pp is not too close to 00 or 11, the binomial distribution is approximately normal:

X≈Y,Y∼N⁡(np,np(1−p)).\boxed{X\approx Y,\qquad Y\sim\operatorname{N}\bigl(np,np(1-p)\bigr)}.

A common practical condition is

np>5andn(1−p)>5,np>5 \qquad\text{and}\qquad n(1-p)>5,

although the exact convention can vary. Both expected successes and expected failures must be sufficiently numerous. Check the convention required by your course.

The binomial variable XX takes integer values, whereas the normal variable YY takes all real values. To make their probability regions align, each integer is represented by an interval of width 11 centred on it.

For example, X=12X=12 is represented by

11.5<Y<12.5.11.5<Y<12.5.

This adjustment is the continuity correction.

Binomial eventCorrected normal event
X=kX=kk−0.5<Y<k+0.5k-0.5<Y<k+0.5
X≤kX\leq kY<k+0.5Y<k+0.5
X<kX<kY<k−0.5Y<k-0.5
X≥kX\geq kY>k−0.5Y>k-0.5
X>kX>kY>k+0.5Y>k+0.5
a≤X≤ba\leq X\leq ba−0.5<Y<b+0.5a-0.5<Y<b+0.5

The strict or inclusive signs do not affect continuous probabilities. The 0.50.5 boundary shift does.

Worked example 13: a cumulative binomial probability

Section titled “Worked example 13: a cumulative binomial probability”

Let

X∼B⁡(100,0.4).X\sim\operatorname{B}(100,0.4).

Use a normal approximation to estimate P⁡(X≤45)\operatorname{P}(X\leq45).

First check suitability:

np=40>5,n(1−p)=60>5.np=40>5, \qquad n(1-p)=60>5.

The approximating distribution has

μ=np=40\mu=np=40

and

σ2=np(1−p)=24,σ=24.\sigma^2=np(1-p)=24, \qquad \sigma=\sqrt{24}.

Apply the continuity correction:

P⁡(X≤45)≈P⁡(Y<45.5),\operatorname{P}(X\leq45)\approx\operatorname{P}(Y<45.5),

where Y∼N⁡(40,24)Y\sim\operatorname{N}(40,24). Therefore

P⁡(X≤45)≈P⁡(Z<45.5−4024)=P⁡(Z<1.12268…)≈0.869.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(X\leq45) &\approx\operatorname{P}\left(Z<\frac{45.5-40}{\sqrt{24}}\right)\\ &=\operatorname{P}(Z<1.12268\ldots)\\ &\approx\boxed{0.869}. \end{aligned}

Each of 200200 seeds germinates independently with probability 0.70.7. Let XX be the number that germinate. Estimate

P⁡(135≤X≤150)\operatorname{P}(135\leq X\leq150)

using a normal approximation.

Here

X∼B⁡(200,0.7).X\sim\operatorname{B}(200,0.7).

The suitability conditions hold because

np=140>5,n(1−p)=60>5.np=140>5, \qquad n(1-p)=60>5.

Use

Y∼N⁡(140,42),Y\sim\operatorname{N}(140,42),

since

np(1−p)=200(0.7)(0.3)=42.np(1-p)=200(0.7)(0.3)=42.

Continuity correction gives

P⁡(135≤X≤150)≈P⁡(134.5<Y<150.5).\operatorname{P}(135\leq X\leq150) \approx \operatorname{P}(134.5<Y<150.5).

Using normal CDF with standard deviation 42\sqrt{42},

P⁡(134.5<Y<150.5)=0.7494…\operatorname{P}(134.5<Y<150.5)=0.7494\ldots

so

P⁡(135≤X≤150)≈0.749.\boxed{\operatorname{P}(135\leq X\leq150)\approx0.749}.

For X∼B⁡(80,0.25)X\sim\operatorname{B}(80,0.25), estimate P⁡(X=18)\operatorname{P}(X=18) using a normal approximation.

Both suitability values exceed 55:

np=20,n(1−p)=60.np=20, \qquad n(1-p)=60.

Use

Y∼N⁡(20,15).Y\sim\operatorname{N}(20,15).

The single discrete value 1818 corresponds to the continuous interval from 17.517.5 to 18.518.5:

P⁡(X=18)≈P⁡(17.5<Y<18.5)≈0.0900.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(X=18) &\approx\operatorname{P}(17.5<Y<18.5)\\ &\approx\boxed{0.0900}. \end{aligned}

Without continuity correction, the normal probability of exactly 1818 would be zero.

Let X∼B⁡(120,0.3)X\sim\operatorname{B}(120,0.3). Use a normal approximation to estimate P⁡(X>40)\operatorname{P}(X>40).

Answer

The conditions hold because np=36np=36 and n(1−p)=84n(1-p)=84. Use

Y∼N⁡(36,25.2).Y\sim\operatorname{N}(36,25.2).

Since X>40X>40 means X≥41X\geq41, continuity correction gives

P⁡(X>40)≈P⁡(Y>40.5).\operatorname{P}(X>40)\approx\operatorname{P}(Y>40.5).

Therefore

P⁡(X>40)≈P⁡(Z>40.5−3625.2)=0.185 approximately.\operatorname{P}(X>40) \approx \operatorname{P}\left(Z>\frac{40.5-36}{\sqrt{25.2}}\right) =\boxed{0.185\text{ approximately}}.
  • Treating σ2\sigma^2 as σ\sigma. In N⁡(μ,σ2)\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2), take the square root of the second parameter before using calculator fields that ask for standard deviation.
  • Using curve height as probability. Probability is area under the curve over an interval.
  • Thinking P⁡(X=a)\operatorname{P}(X=a) is positive. It is 00 for a continuous random variable.
  • Entering an upper-tail area into inverse normal. Convert it to the left-tail area first unless the calculator explicitly accepts a tail choice.
  • Splitting a central area incorrectly. Divide the excluded area equally between the two tails.
  • Assuming every symmetric data set is normal. A normal model must also be unimodal, smoothly tapering and contextually reasonable.
  • Approximating a binomial without checking conditions. Verify both npnp and n(1−p)n(1-p).
  • Forgetting continuity correction. Translate the integer event before using the continuous model.
  1. X∼N⁡(52,72)X\sim\operatorname{N}(52,7^2). Find P⁡(45<X<60)\operatorname{P}(45<X<60).
  2. For the same distribution, find kk if P⁡(X>k)=0.15\operatorname{P}(X>k)=0.15.
  3. Y∼N⁡(μ,32)Y\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,3^2) and P⁡(Y<18)=0.25\operatorname{P}(Y<18)=0.25. Find μ\mu.
  4. B∼B⁡(250,0.6)B\sim\operatorname{B}(250,0.6). State an approximating normal distribution and the corrected event for P⁡(B≥160)\operatorname{P}(B\geq160).
Answers

1. Using normal CDF,

P⁡(45<X<60)=0.715 approximately.\operatorname{P}(45<X<60)=\boxed{0.715\text{ approximately}}.

2. The area to the left of kk is 0.850.85. Thus

k=52+z0.85(7)=52+(1.03643…)(7)=59.3 approximately.k=52+z_{0.85}(7) =52+(1.03643\ldots)(7) =\boxed{59.3\text{ approximately}}.

3. Since z0.25=−0.67449…z_{0.25}=-0.67449\ldots,

18−μ3=−0.67449…\frac{18-\mu}{3}=-0.67449\ldots

so

μ≈20.0.\boxed{\mu\approx20.0}.

4. The mean and variance are

np=150,np(1−p)=60.np=150, \qquad np(1-p)=60.

Therefore

Y∼N⁡(150,60)\boxed{Y\sim\operatorname{N}(150,60)}

is suitable, and

P⁡(B≥160)≈P⁡(Y>159.5).\boxed{\operatorname{P}(B\geq160)\approx\operatorname{P}(Y>159.5)}.

Before finishing a normal distribution problem, check that you have:

  1. identified μ\mu, σ2\sigma^2 and σ\sigma correctly;
  2. translated the words into a probability region;
  3. used a complement or symmetry correctly where needed;
  4. converted an upper-tail area before inverse normal;
  5. checked whether the numerical answer is plausible;
  6. checked approximation conditions and applied continuity correction for a binomial variable;
  7. stated probabilities between 00 and 11 and rounded only at the end.